The curriculum is organized into topics, and each topic contains learning modules. There are learning outcome statements at the beginning of each learning module.Below you'll find current outlines by level. Each outline includes learning outcome statements (LOS) and source references for the learning module.
CFA 2014 Level 2 Curriculum
Amount paid: $640.00 ***************************RECEIPT*************************** Quantity Item Price 1 Level II CFA Examination Registration $1,020.00 1 Level II Print Curriculum June 2014 $150.00 Discount $550.00 Shipping $20.00 Tax $0.00 Print curriculum will be shipped within one to two business days. Value for Customs purposes only. Personal educational materials. Not for sale or re-sale. Payment Method: Credit Card Payment Type: Visa Transaction Amount: $640.00
I tried for half an hour to avoid the ebook in different ways. I tried to use the link given above. I tried to switch the ebook for print curriculum in other ways and also attempted to checkout without any curriculum added to the exam registration. In the end all these attempts failed and I could only register with the ebooks added.
At the EU Member State level, for example, the UK Financial Conduct Authority has approximately 2,500 employees. Since January 2014 they have produced 40 consultation papers and six discussion papers. Even the Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA), overseeing the markets in a country of 5 million inhabitants, has more staff than ESMA at the moment (200 employees). In 2014 the Finnish FSA produced four research papers and nine consultations. While the number of consultation papers and reports produced is not a completely fair comparison point, it does give an indication of the imbalance in funding faced by transnational authorities vis-à-vis national Member State supervisors.
ESMA is not the only transnational authority stretching the pennies. The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) General Secretariat only has 30 members of staff, 10 of which are seconded national experts. Since January 2014 they have produced 13 public consultations and 17 final reports. The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) notes in its budget plan that the total number of staff in 2015 will be 146. The EIOPA Work Programme for 2015 foresees that over the course of this year the Authority will produce over 20 reports, including on the transferability of pension rights and on consumer protection issues, though some of the work will be delayed due to budgetary challenges. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approximately 4,200 employees, yet the lack of resources has continuously been noted by both the current Chair Mary Jo White and by the former Chair Mary L. Schapiro. The CFA Institute-co-sponsored Systemic Risk Council has raised similar funding concerns since 2012.
Interesting. The EU regulatory bodies are understaffed while a number of national regulatory bodies seem to be overstaffed. Perhaps, on EU level with tight budgets, they could consider to employ retired professionals on less formal contracts and procedures than the normal vetting and application devices. .In this way, many retired ex-regulators and supervisers could be put to good use which would benefit both sides. However, I fear that ageism reigns supreme in the EU as everywhere else.
Darlene- systemwide committees- Academic Conference Implementation Committee- providing space and dialogue between faculty and trustees, students and administration. Program hosted and funded by the chancellor, Long Beach, Nov. 13-14, 2014. Conference will be videotaped and shared throughout the system.
The U.S. equity market has become increasingly oversold due to the accelerating declines of the last several trading days. The S&P 500 is now well below its 50- and 200-day moving averages and other technical indicators neared short-term downside extremes in early trading Thursday before stabilizing. Investor sentiment is also troughing with the American Association of Individual Investors Sentiment Survey at its lowest level since April 2013. Short-term leveraged market players, meanwhile, are at the lower end of their equity exposure.
The U.S. defense budget has remained well supported as geopolitical tensions have risen, in the face of advanced defense technologies demonstrated by China and Russia. We believe the current conflict between Ukraine and Russia will only increase the level of urgency felt by Congress to prioritize defense spending and could re-ignite funding for overseas contingency operations (i.e. emergency funding) which declined in tandem with the U.S. withdrawal from the Middle East. In such a scenario, both core defense budget and OCO funding should support defense stocks across the board. The challenge for the U.S. will be to balance long-term strategic goals to advance technologies with nearer term needs such as land-based warfare and military presence. We would also anticipate an increase in foreign sales to allies in Europe and Pacific Rim, which should further support U.S. defense stocks. 2ff7e9595c